Kerolex Academic Press (KAP) follows a rigorous, fair, and transparent peer review process across all its journals to ensure the publication of high-quality and reliable research.

Type of Peer Review

All journals under KAP follow a double-blind peer review system, where:

  • The identity of authors is not disclosed to reviewers
  • The identity of reviewers is not disclosed to authors

This ensures an unbiased and objective evaluation process.

Review Process

1

Initial Screening

The editorial team evaluates the manuscript for scope, originality, and basic quality.

2

Reviewer Assignment

Manuscripts are assigned to qualified subject experts.

3

Peer Review

Reviewers assess the manuscript based on:

  • Scientific quality
  • Originality
  • Relevance to journal scope
  • Clarity and presentation
4

Reviewer Feedback

Reviewers provide constructive comments and recommendations.

5

Editorial Decision

Based on reviewer comments, the editor makes one of the following decisions:

Accept Minor Revision Major Revision Reject

Review Timeline

  • Initial editorial decision: within 1–2 weeks
  • Final decision after review: within 2–4 weeks

Note: Timeline may vary depending on reviewer availability.

Confidentiality

  • All submitted manuscripts are treated as confidential documents
  • Reviewers must not share or use unpublished information

Conflict of Interest

  • Reviewers and editors must disclose any conflicts of interest
  • Manuscripts will be reassigned if a conflict is identified

Ethical Standards for Review

  • Reviews must be objective, constructive, and respectful
  • Personal criticism of authors is not acceptable

Final Decision

  • The final decision on manuscript acceptance rests with the editorial board
  • Decisions are based on quality, originality, and relevance

Interested in Becoming a Reviewer?

Join our community of expert reviewers and contribute to maintaining high standards in scholarly publishing.

Register as Reviewer →